On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:53:14AM +0000, Liam Girdwood wrote: > On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 13:42 +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote: > > Yes, I don't see any urgent reason to push this hack in. Better to check > > dev_name change first. What I'm going to propose there is "spix.y" to > > "spi-INTABCD:xy" and "x-00yz" to "i2c-INTABCD:xy" > We probably need to be able to match on ACPI name alone as some BIOS > settings can change the I2C bus number and break the name match used at > bind time. e.g. on Haswell the codec can either be on I2C bus 0 or 7. Indeed. The way I initially read the suggestion above the idea was to replace the bus number with the ACPI name for the device which seemed sensible but now I reread the bus number is still there.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature