Re: [RFC 1/2] i2c: Use stable dev_name for ACPI enumerated I2C slaves

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Rafael

On 10/25/2013 05:08 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, October 25, 2013  04:30:23 PM Jarkko Nikula wrote:
>>>
>> Hmm, not only. Referencing to dev field in struct acpi_device by
>> dev_name(&adev->dev) here will fail too.
>
> Well, something is not quite right here.
>
> One of the *reasons* for having ACPI_HANDLE() defined this way is to
> avoid using explicit CONFIG_ACPI checks, so if that doesn't work,
> then all of that becomes a bit pointless.
>
One possible thing to do is to let structure definitions to be available for non-ACPI builds. Then compiler won't fail on structure access which will be anyway optimized away by later compiler stages.

With a quick test below vmlinux section sizes don't change for couple non-ACPI build tests and allow to get rid off IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI) test in this patch. It's very minimal as it only moves the CONFIG_ACPI test just after the struct acpi_device definition and defines acpi_bus_get_device for non-ACPI case.

What I don't know how consistent it is as there are still couple structure definitions under CONFIG_ACPI, doesn't touch other acpi headers and requires to include acpi_bus.h in driver (or move acpi_bus.h include in linux/acpi.h currently under CONFIG_ACPI).

--
Jarkko

diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
index d901982..7ab7870 100644
--- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
+++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
@@ -66,8 +66,6 @@ bool acpi_ata_match(acpi_handle handle);
 bool acpi_bay_match(acpi_handle handle);
 bool acpi_dock_match(acpi_handle handle);

-#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
-
 #include <linux/proc_fs.h>

 #define ACPI_BUS_FILE_ROOT    "acpi"
@@ -314,6 +312,8 @@ struct acpi_device {
     void (*remove)(struct acpi_device *);
 };

+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI)
+
 static inline void *acpi_driver_data(struct acpi_device *d)
 {
     return d->driver_data;
@@ -531,6 +531,8 @@ static inline bool acpi_device_can_poweroff(struct acpi_device *adev)

 static inline int register_acpi_bus_type(void *bus) { return 0; }
 static inline int unregister_acpi_bus_type(void *bus) { return 0; }
+static inline int acpi_bus_get_device(acpi_handle handle,
+                      struct acpi_device **device) { return 0; }

 #endif                /* CONFIG_ACPI */

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux