On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 09:53:28AM +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote: > On 10/24/2013 12:51 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > >Did anything happen with the idea of making dev_name() use the ACPI > >name? > Well, looks like I manage to put it aside. I'll spin it again as > next merge window starts to be too near now. OK, I was asking because I was thinking of applying the patch for now; it's not that it's a bad idea it just seems like it's something that might might make sense solved at that level. Equally well I don't know if these systems will work with v3.13 anyway so perhaps it's not so urgent.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
