On Tuesday, October 30, 2012 09:52:41 AM Feng Tang wrote: > Currently when advance_transaction() is called in EC interrupt handler, > if there is nothing driver can do with the interrupt, it will be taken > as a false one. > > But this is not always true, as there may be a SCI EC interrupt fired > during normal read/write operation, which should not be counted as a > false one. This patch fixes the problem. > > Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@xxxxxxxxx> Applied to the linux-next branch of the linux-pm.git tree as v3.8 material. Thanks, Rafael > --- > drivers/acpi/ec.c | 8 ++++++-- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/ec.c b/drivers/acpi/ec.c > index f272880..6bdea02 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/ec.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/ec.c > @@ -198,9 +198,13 @@ static void advance_transaction(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 status) > t->done = true; > goto unlock; > err: > - /* false interrupt, state didn't change */ > - if (in_interrupt()) > + /* > + * If SCI bit is set, then don't think it's a false IRQ > + * otherwise will take a not handled IRQ as a false one. > + */ > + if (in_interrupt() && !(status & ACPI_EC_FLAG_SCI)) > ++t->irq_count; > + > unlock: > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags); > } > -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
