Re: [PATCH 1/4] ACPI: EC: Cleanup the member name for spinlock/mutex in struct acpi_ec

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday, October 30, 2012 09:52:38 AM Feng Tang wrote:
> Current member names for mutex/spinlock are a little confusing.
> 
> Change the
> {
> 	struct mutex lock;
> 	spinlock_t curr_lock;
> }
> to
> {
> 	struct mutex mutex;
> 	spinlock_t lock;
> }
> 
> So that the code is cleaner and easier to read.

Applied to the linux-next branch of the linux-pm.git tree as v3.8 material.

Thanks,
Rafael




> Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/ec.c       |   52 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>  drivers/acpi/internal.h |    4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/ec.c b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
> index a51df96..29f349c 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/ec.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
> @@ -158,10 +158,10 @@ static int ec_transaction_done(struct acpi_ec *ec)
>  {
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	int ret = 0;
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->curr_lock, flags);
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, flags);
>  	if (!ec->curr || ec->curr->done)
>  		ret = 1;
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->curr_lock, flags);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags);
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ static void start_transaction(struct acpi_ec *ec)
>  static void advance_transaction(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 status)
>  {
>  	unsigned long flags;
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->curr_lock, flags);
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, flags);
>  	if (!ec->curr)
>  		goto unlock;
>  	if (ec->curr->wlen > ec->curr->wi) {
> @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ err:
>  	if (in_interrupt())
>  		++ec->curr->irq_count;
>  unlock:
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->curr_lock, flags);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags);
>  }
>  
>  static int acpi_ec_sync_query(struct acpi_ec *ec);
> @@ -238,9 +238,9 @@ static int ec_poll(struct acpi_ec *ec)
>  		if (acpi_ec_read_status(ec) & ACPI_EC_FLAG_IBF)
>  			break;
>  		pr_debug(PREFIX "controller reset, restart transaction\n");
> -		spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->curr_lock, flags);
> +		spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, flags);
>  		start_transaction(ec);
> -		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->curr_lock, flags);
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags);
>  	}
>  	return -ETIME;
>  }
> @@ -253,17 +253,17 @@ static int acpi_ec_transaction_unlocked(struct acpi_ec *ec,
>  	if (EC_FLAGS_MSI)
>  		udelay(ACPI_EC_MSI_UDELAY);
>  	/* start transaction */
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->curr_lock, tmp);
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, tmp);
>  	/* following two actions should be kept atomic */
>  	ec->curr = t;
>  	start_transaction(ec);
>  	if (ec->curr->command == ACPI_EC_COMMAND_QUERY)
>  		clear_bit(EC_FLAGS_QUERY_PENDING, &ec->flags);
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->curr_lock, tmp);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, tmp);
>  	ret = ec_poll(ec);
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->curr_lock, tmp);
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, tmp);
>  	ec->curr = NULL;
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->curr_lock, tmp);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, tmp);
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ static int acpi_ec_transaction(struct acpi_ec *ec, struct transaction *t)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	if (t->rdata)
>  		memset(t->rdata, 0, t->rlen);
> -	mutex_lock(&ec->lock);
> +	mutex_lock(&ec->mutex);
>  	if (test_bit(EC_FLAGS_BLOCKED, &ec->flags)) {
>  		status = -EINVAL;
>  		goto unlock;
> @@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ end:
>  	if (ec->global_lock)
>  		acpi_release_global_lock(glk);
>  unlock:
> -	mutex_unlock(&ec->lock);
> +	mutex_unlock(&ec->mutex);
>  	return status;
>  }
>  
> @@ -468,10 +468,10 @@ void acpi_ec_block_transactions(void)
>  	if (!ec)
>  		return;
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&ec->lock);
> +	mutex_lock(&ec->mutex);
>  	/* Prevent transactions from being carried out */
>  	set_bit(EC_FLAGS_BLOCKED, &ec->flags);
> -	mutex_unlock(&ec->lock);
> +	mutex_unlock(&ec->mutex);
>  }
>  
>  void acpi_ec_unblock_transactions(void)
> @@ -481,10 +481,10 @@ void acpi_ec_unblock_transactions(void)
>  	if (!ec)
>  		return;
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&ec->lock);
> +	mutex_lock(&ec->mutex);
>  	/* Allow transactions to be carried out again */
>  	clear_bit(EC_FLAGS_BLOCKED, &ec->flags);
> -	mutex_unlock(&ec->lock);
> +	mutex_unlock(&ec->mutex);
>  }
>  
>  void acpi_ec_unblock_transactions_early(void)
> @@ -536,9 +536,9 @@ int acpi_ec_add_query_handler(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 query_bit,
>  	handler->handle = handle;
>  	handler->func = func;
>  	handler->data = data;
> -	mutex_lock(&ec->lock);
> +	mutex_lock(&ec->mutex);
>  	list_add(&handler->node, &ec->list);
> -	mutex_unlock(&ec->lock);
> +	mutex_unlock(&ec->mutex);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -547,14 +547,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_ec_add_query_handler);
>  void acpi_ec_remove_query_handler(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 query_bit)
>  {
>  	struct acpi_ec_query_handler *handler, *tmp;
> -	mutex_lock(&ec->lock);
> +	mutex_lock(&ec->mutex);
>  	list_for_each_entry_safe(handler, tmp, &ec->list, node) {
>  		if (query_bit == handler->query_bit) {
>  			list_del(&handler->node);
>  			kfree(handler);
>  		}
>  	}
> -	mutex_unlock(&ec->lock);
> +	mutex_unlock(&ec->mutex);
>  }
>  
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_ec_remove_query_handler);
> @@ -601,9 +601,9 @@ static void acpi_ec_gpe_query(void *ec_cxt)
>  	struct acpi_ec *ec = ec_cxt;
>  	if (!ec)
>  		return;
> -	mutex_lock(&ec->lock);
> +	mutex_lock(&ec->mutex);
>  	acpi_ec_sync_query(ec);
> -	mutex_unlock(&ec->lock);
> +	mutex_unlock(&ec->mutex);
>  }
>  
>  static int ec_check_sci(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 state)
> @@ -691,10 +691,10 @@ static struct acpi_ec *make_acpi_ec(void)
>  	if (!ec)
>  		return NULL;
>  	ec->flags = 1 << EC_FLAGS_QUERY_PENDING;
> -	mutex_init(&ec->lock);
> +	mutex_init(&ec->mutex);
>  	init_waitqueue_head(&ec->wait);
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ec->list);
> -	spin_lock_init(&ec->curr_lock);
> +	spin_lock_init(&ec->lock);
>  	return ec;
>  }
>  
> @@ -853,12 +853,12 @@ static int acpi_ec_remove(struct acpi_device *device, int type)
>  
>  	ec = acpi_driver_data(device);
>  	ec_remove_handlers(ec);
> -	mutex_lock(&ec->lock);
> +	mutex_lock(&ec->mutex);
>  	list_for_each_entry_safe(handler, tmp, &ec->list, node) {
>  		list_del(&handler->node);
>  		kfree(handler);
>  	}
> -	mutex_unlock(&ec->lock);
> +	mutex_unlock(&ec->mutex);
>  	release_region(ec->data_addr, 1);
>  	release_region(ec->command_addr, 1);
>  	device->driver_data = NULL;
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/internal.h b/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> index ca75b9c..509dcaa 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> @@ -58,11 +58,11 @@ struct acpi_ec {
>  	unsigned long data_addr;
>  	unsigned long global_lock;
>  	unsigned long flags;
> -	struct mutex lock;
> +	struct mutex mutex;
>  	wait_queue_head_t wait;
>  	struct list_head list;
>  	struct transaction *curr;
> -	spinlock_t curr_lock;
> +	spinlock_t lock;
>  };
>  
>  extern struct acpi_ec *first_ec;
> 
-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux