On Tuesday, October 30, 2012 09:52:40 AM Feng Tang wrote: > Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/acpi/osl.c | 7 +------ > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/drivers/acpi/osl.c > index 9eaf708..e76a7f5 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c > @@ -949,12 +949,7 @@ static acpi_status __acpi_os_execute(acpi_execute_type type, > (type == OSL_NOTIFY_HANDLER ? kacpi_notify_wq : kacpid_wq); > dpc->wait = hp ? 1 : 0; > > - if (queue == kacpi_hotplug_wq) > - INIT_WORK(&dpc->work, acpi_os_execute_deferred); > - else if (queue == kacpi_notify_wq) > - INIT_WORK(&dpc->work, acpi_os_execute_deferred); > - else > - INIT_WORK(&dpc->work, acpi_os_execute_deferred); > + INIT_WORK(&dpc->work, acpi_os_execute_deferred); > > /* > * On some machines, a software-initiated SMI causes corruption unless The check is not really useless, because it prevents lockdep from complaining unnecessarily. I have applied a different patch to document this. Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
