On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 05:59 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, December 06, 2010, Lin Ming wrote: > > Some function and variable names are renamed to be consistent with > > ACPICA code base. > > > > acpi_raw_enable_gpe -> acpi_ev_add_gpe_reference > > acpi_raw_disable_gpe -> acpi_ev_remove_gpe_reference > > acpi_gpe_can_wake -> acpi_setup_gpe_for_wake > > acpi_gpe_wakeup -> acpi_set_gpe_wake_mask > > acpi_update_gpes -> acpi_update_all_gpes > > acpi_all_gpes_initialized -> acpi_gbl_all_gpes_initialized > > acpi_handler_info -> acpi_gpe_handler_info > > ... > > > > Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@xxxxxxxxx> > > Well, tha changes related to acpi_ev_gpe_dispatch() do not really match the > changelog. I'd prefer them to go into a separate patch with the right > description. OK, will split it. Thanks. > > ... > > u32 > > -acpi_ev_gpe_dispatch(struct acpi_gpe_event_info *gpe_event_info, > > +acpi_ev_gpe_dispatch(struct acpi_namespace_node *gpe_device, > > + struct acpi_gpe_event_info *gpe_event_info, > > u32 gpe_number); > > > ... > > int_status |= > > - acpi_ev_gpe_dispatch(&gpe_block-> > > + acpi_ev_gpe_dispatch(gpe_block-> > > + node, > > + &gpe_block-> > > event_info[((acpi_size) i * ACPI_GPE_REGISTER_WIDTH) + j], j + gpe_register_info->base_gpe_number); > > } > > } > ... > > @@ -589,7 +597,9 @@ acpi_ev_gpe_dispatch(struct acpi_gpe_event_info *gpe_event_info, u32 gpe_number) > > * Ignore return status for now. > > * TBD: leave GPE disabled on error? > > */ > > - (void)gpe_event_info->dispatch.handler->address(gpe_event_info-> > > + (void)gpe_event_info->dispatch.handler->address(gpe_device, > > + gpe_number, > > + gpe_event_info-> > > dispatch. > > handler-> > > context); > ... > > Thanks, > Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
