On Monday, December 06, 2010, Lin Ming wrote: > Some function and variable names are renamed to be consistent with > ACPICA code base. > > acpi_raw_enable_gpe -> acpi_ev_add_gpe_reference > acpi_raw_disable_gpe -> acpi_ev_remove_gpe_reference > acpi_gpe_can_wake -> acpi_setup_gpe_for_wake > acpi_gpe_wakeup -> acpi_set_gpe_wake_mask > acpi_update_gpes -> acpi_update_all_gpes > acpi_all_gpes_initialized -> acpi_gbl_all_gpes_initialized > acpi_handler_info -> acpi_gpe_handler_info > ... > > Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@xxxxxxxxx> Well, tha changes related to acpi_ev_gpe_dispatch() do not really match the changelog. I'd prefer them to go into a separate patch with the right description. ... > u32 > -acpi_ev_gpe_dispatch(struct acpi_gpe_event_info *gpe_event_info, > +acpi_ev_gpe_dispatch(struct acpi_namespace_node *gpe_device, > + struct acpi_gpe_event_info *gpe_event_info, > u32 gpe_number); > ... > int_status |= > - acpi_ev_gpe_dispatch(&gpe_block-> > + acpi_ev_gpe_dispatch(gpe_block-> > + node, > + &gpe_block-> > event_info[((acpi_size) i * ACPI_GPE_REGISTER_WIDTH) + j], j + gpe_register_info->base_gpe_number); > } > } ... > @@ -589,7 +597,9 @@ acpi_ev_gpe_dispatch(struct acpi_gpe_event_info *gpe_event_info, u32 gpe_number) > * Ignore return status for now. > * TBD: leave GPE disabled on error? > */ > - (void)gpe_event_info->dispatch.handler->address(gpe_event_info-> > + (void)gpe_event_info->dispatch.handler->address(gpe_device, > + gpe_number, > + gpe_event_info-> > dispatch. > handler-> > context); ... Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
