Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Paravirtualizing bits of acpi access

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tian, Kevin wrote:
Though, come to think of it, perhaps there's no harm in letting the kernel do its own state-saving. I'll check.


Well, I guess it's doable, since do_suspend_lowlevel also needs
to restore processor context upon S3 failure (function return from
acpi_enter_sleep_state instead of from wakeup stub).

From a quick look, it seems that all the instructions in the restore code are ones that Xen will trap and emulate; but with this kind of thing, its all in the testing...

   J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux