Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Paravirtualizing bits of acpi access

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 07:20:12PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday 23 March 2009, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > And then Xen jumps in to finish remaining steps. From this angle,
> > Xen is not a completely new platform and, well, S3 is more like a
> > 'S1' type from dom0's p.o.v with a different trigger method. Then is
> > it overkilled to introduce a new set of ops with 99% content 
> > duplicated?
> 
> IMO, no, it isn't.

I'd disagree. Duplicating the code means remembering to apply bugfixes 
to both parts.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux