On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 06:38:53PM +0300, Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > - patch toshiba_acpi to return KEY_SUSPEND/KEY_HIBERNATE instead of > KEY_SLEEP/KEY_SUSPEND. This depends on commit > 6932b918e05b06165ed3457a9f3aa279099a7cbd in linux-next. > > - patch HAL to recognize KEY_HIBERNATE and return "suspend" for > KEY_SUSPEND; right now it is: > > [KEY_SLEEP] = "sleep", > [KEY_SUSPEND] = "hibernate", Ugh. Why are we changing this? The semantics were pretty clear before. The KEY_SUSPEND to hibernate mapping was decided years ago, and it's clearly an incompatible change as far as userspace goes. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
