On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 11:13:49AM +0000, Richard Hughes wrote: > After reviewing the platform drivers in ACPI, it appears few of them > know whether KEY_SLEEP corresponds to suspend or hibernate, and > KEY_SUSPEND seems to be used for hibernate. Basically, it's a mess. KEY_SUSPEND has always been pretty clearly used for hibernate for, well, forever. I don't think the distinction is a useful one. How many machines are going to have both a sleep and a suspend key? This is a user-visible change in behaviour. I think we're too entrenched for it to make much of a difference now. Adding a #define KEY_HIBERNATE KEY_SUSPEND sounds fine to me, but I really don't think we need anything more. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
