Yinghai Lu wrote:
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Ingo Molnar wrote:
yes, that end result is the desired state of things. We did run with
this for several months and resolved all the cases that needed fixing,
but dropped them when the ACPI tree moved out from under us.
Can resurrect it if Len feels OK about the concept. Len, you shouldnt
worry about conflicts - we can do it after the ACPI changes of this
merge window are upstream so there should be no conflict trouble at
all. How does that sound?
Doesn't look like these changes made it in this time. Did they get
overlooked, or did some other problem come up? Or did you want me to
dig them up?
Thanks,
J
please check attached that are updated to today tip/master with ingo's genapic patchset..
The look OK, but they didn't get merged into tip/master?
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
