On Tue 2008-12-16 20:53:35, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 06:07:15PM +0000, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:37:46 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > > > > I seem to be missing the original message, but: no, s2ram doesn't exist > > > in Ubuntu because pm-utils handles that role. > > > > Well, that's *their* argument but lots of people think otherwise. There > > appears to be no shortage of people for whom pm-utils does NOT work yet > > s2ram does. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/uswsusp/+bug/134238 > > The right answer to "This piece of software contains bugs" is not > "Provide two pieces of software with the same features but different > bugs". The only real functional difference between the two is that Yes, and that's why pm-utils should die: they have design problems (depend on hal, can't be pagelocked, unusable for suspend debugging). Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
