On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 06:07:15PM +0000, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:37:46 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > > I seem to be missing the original message, but: no, s2ram doesn't exist > > in Ubuntu because pm-utils handles that role. > > Well, that's *their* argument but lots of people think otherwise. There > appears to be no shortage of people for whom pm-utils does NOT work yet > s2ram does. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/uswsusp/+bug/134238 The right answer to "This piece of software contains bugs" is not "Provide two pieces of software with the same features but different bugs". The only real functional difference between the two is that s2ram has its own internal whitelist rather than just using the hal entries. Suse have normally been good at making sure that they're synced across, but if that's not happening you probably want to poke them. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
