On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 05:13:08PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, 16 of December 2008, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:25:37 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > Because the hal-driven whitelist allows us to match systems in a more > > > detailed way. If your system is in the s2ram whitelist already and > > > works with it, there shouldn't be any difference. > > > > Unfortunately, Ubuntu in their "wisdom" removed s2ram and claim "s2both" > > supersedes it in that it does both suspend to disk and suspend to ram and > > then suspends, but if your battery dies while suspended you can still > > resume from the suspend to disk. I seem to be missing the original message, but: no, s2ram doesn't exist in Ubuntu because pm-utils handles that role. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
