On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 08:19:08 +0200 Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'm dropping the ACPI part because we're getting too many > reports of scary looking backtraces and ACPI exceptions are actually > not that exceptional. when I talked to Len about it he implied/said that these would only happen for ACPI code bugs (and not bios bugs). Maybe he was overestimating what the code would actually do; if so it would imo be well worth splitting out ACPI code assertions versions things that are BIOS caused (if only to be able to inform the user more consistently) -- If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html