Hi Andi, On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 08:17:31 +0200 Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > On Sun, 06 Jul 2008 20:48:49 +0200 Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> The trees for the next ACPI merge are at git.kernel.org now > >> These are based on Len's branches with some additional patches. > >> > >> (based on Linus' tree aka 2.6.26rc9) > >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ak/linux-acpi-2.6.git release > >> Intended for the 2.6.27 merge > > > > If that is true .. > > > >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/linux/kernel/ak/linux-acpi-2.6.git test > > > > Then why is linux-next tracking that? > > It is tracking Len's tree not mine, right? /me hits himself in the head :-) Sorry about that. > Or did you switch already to mine? No, I only do what is asked of me :-) Time I got my glasses replaced :-) > > Is there something we can do about those dependencies? > > It's some patches from Henrique that require rfkill changes > in the net tree. I'm also not happy about that (it complicates > everything here), but cannot do much about it. OK, yeah that is a pain. > > So what is missing, and why should we merge stuff in 2.6.27 that we don't > > see until the merge window? (Not trying to be antagonistic, just asking > > about procedure and wondering why stuff for 2.6.27 is still not in > > linux-next.) > > Because they're small fixes and would go in later anyways. > > And because I haven't gone through all of them yet due to time > reasons, but I cannot say categorically I'll delay them all. OK. This is all not so relevant since I misread above. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgppZA58y2IlQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
