Am 01.01.70 um 01:00 schrieb :
My hardware comes with a DSDT with 32-bit tables, however I would like to add a
64-bit table via SSDT. Although, my SSDT compiles and loads successfully, the
kernel truncates my 64-bit values because it apparently remembers that the DSDT
used 32-bit tables. Is there a way to have a 64-bit SSDT, to augment a 32-bit DSDT?
I don't quite understand the reason for truncating the SSDT values. The original
code (from 2005!) warns that this is potentially a serious problem in the ACPI
table(s) due to (possibly) buggy ASL compilers. However, in my case, I want
to explicitly have a 64-bit SSDT, and set the ComplianceRevision to 2 specifically
to support 64-bit integers. But alas, they are still truncated due to a global
setting of
acpi_gbl_integer_bit_width = 32;
acpi_gbl_integer_nybble_width = 8;
acpi_gbl_integer_byte_width = 4;
versus having table specific settings. Is there a workaround for this issue?
It would be quite painful (both for me, and for customers) to get new firmware
with a higher ComplianceRevision in the DSDT. I wonder if there is an acceptable
alternative. For example, is truncation really required still (are we still dealing with
buggy ASL compilers after 19 more years have elapsed?). Should there be a
kernel command line parameter, or a kernel config option, to disable truncation?
Should these acpi_gbl_integer_* variables be table specific, rather than global?
I would appreciate any insights or advice you can offer me. Thanks in advance!
Some additional references:
1. truncation occurs in file drivers/acpi/acpica/exutils.c
function acpi_ex_truncate_for32bit_table
2. initial setting of the globals occurs in file drivers/acpi/utilities/utmisc.c
function acpi_ut_set_integer_width
Hi,
the ACPI specification says that the integer length for _both_ DSDT and SSDT tables
is controlled by the revision field of the DSDT, so your 32-bit DSDT prevents your
SSDT from using 64-bit integers.
The only solution for this would be to not use 64-bit values inside your SSDT, is
there a reason why you absolutely need 64-bit integers in your DSDT?
Thanks,
Armin Wolf
