On 5/23/23 03:46, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 1:24 AM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dave Jiang wrote:
ACPI_CEDT_DSMAS_NON_VOLATILE should be defined as
ACPI_CDAT_DSMAS_NON_VOLATILE. Fix misspelled define.
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
---
See https://github.com/acpica/acpica/pull/874
Merged
---
include/acpi/actbl1.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/acpi/actbl1.h b/include/acpi/actbl1.h
index 81b9e794424d..15df363b9144 100644
--- a/include/acpi/actbl1.h
+++ b/include/acpi/actbl1.h
@@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ struct acpi_cdat_dsmas {
/* Flags for subtable above */
-#define ACPI_CEDT_DSMAS_NON_VOLATILE (1 << 2)
+#define ACPI_CDAT_DSMAS_NON_VOLATILE (1 << 2)
This needs to come in through an ACPICA update. If that is going to happen
this cycle, great, if not then I would handle it as a merge fixup after
the fact. I.e. just live with the misspelling to keep this patch set
ACPICA unencumbered, unless Rafael has different thoughts.
You can also submit an upstream ACPICA pull request with this change
and resend the patch with a Link tag pointing to that PR. Then we'll
decide how to handle it.
That's been done and merged. I'll include the Link tag in the next rev.
