On Sun, 02 Jul 2006 10:41:56 +0200 Johan Vromans wrote: > "Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > a. patch should also be sent to linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (cc-ed) > > b. patch does not apply cleanly to latest kernel > > c. missing Signed-off-by: line (see Documentation/SubmittingPatches) > > d. incorrect patch filename directory level (see SubmittingPatches) > > All procedural issues, than can easily be solved. Agreed. > So I take it there > are no technical/philosophical/emotional/ethical objections against > this change? We are still waiting for feedback/comments to determine that. --- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html