Re: Battery-related regression between 2.6.17-git3 and 2.6.17-git6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Sunday 02 July 2006 00:21, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> With the recent -git on my box (Asus L5D, x86_64 SUSE 10) the powersave
> demon is apparently unable to get the battery status, although the data in
> /proc/acpi/battery/BAT0 seem to be correct.  As a result, battery status
> notification via kpowersave doesn't work and it's hard to notice when the
> battery is low/critical.
> 
> So far I have verified that this feature works fine with 2.6.17-git3 and
> doesn't work with 2.6.17-git6 (-git5 doesn't compile here).
> 
> I'll try to get more information tomorrow (unless someone in the know has
> an idea of what's up ;-) ).

I've verified that the problem first appeared in 2.6.17-git4.

Greetings,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux