"Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > a. patch should also be sent to linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (cc-ed) > b. patch does not apply cleanly to latest kernel > c. missing Signed-off-by: line (see Documentation/SubmittingPatches) > d. incorrect patch filename directory level (see SubmittingPatches) All procedural issues, than can easily be solved. So I take it there are no technical/philosophical/emotional/ethical objections against this change? -- Johan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
