RE: [patch 10/13] Remove acpi_os_create_lock(), acpi_os_delete_lock()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This will not always be the case, in fact we are about to expand the use
of the spinlock interfaces.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-acpi-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-acpi-
> owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of akpm@xxxxxxxx
> Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 8:19 PM
> To: Brown, Len
> Cc: linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; akpm@xxxxxxxx; adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [patch 10/13] Remove acpi_os_create_lock(),
acpi_os_delete_lock()
> 
> 
> From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Minimally intrusive patch to remove some overdesign in ACPI code.
Based
> on hch rant.
> 
> The only purpose of functions in question is to dynamically allocate
one
> global spinlock -- acpi_gbl_gpe_lock.  Instead, create it in .bss.
> 
> It's tempting to shoot acpi_os_release_lock() et al too.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Brown, Len" <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
>  drivers/acpi/osl.c               |   30 -----------------------------
>  drivers/acpi/utilities/utmutex.c |    6 +++--
>  include/acpi/acpiosxf.h          |    4 ---
>  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> 
> diff -puN drivers/acpi/osl.c~remove-acpi_os_create_lock-
> acpi_os_delete_lock drivers/acpi/osl.c
> --- devel/drivers/acpi/osl.c~remove-acpi_os_create_lock-
> acpi_os_delete_lock	2006-06-01 20:17:08.000000000 -0700
> +++ devel-akpm/drivers/acpi/osl.c	2006-06-01 20:17:08.000000000
-0700
> @@ -668,36 +668,6 @@ void acpi_os_wait_events_complete(void *
> 
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_os_wait_events_complete);
> 
> -/*
> - * Allocate the memory for a spinlock and initialize it.
> - */
> -acpi_status acpi_os_create_lock(acpi_handle * out_handle)
> -{
> -	spinlock_t *lock_ptr;
> -
> -	lock_ptr = kmalloc(sizeof(spinlock_t), GFP_KERNEL);
> -
> -	spin_lock_init(lock_ptr);
> -
> -	ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_MUTEX, "Creating spinlock[%p].\n",
> lock_ptr));
> -
> -	*out_handle = lock_ptr;
> -
> -	return AE_OK;
> -}
> -
> -/*
> - * Deallocate the memory for a spinlock.
> - */
> -void acpi_os_delete_lock(acpi_handle handle)
> -{
> -	ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_MUTEX, "Deleting spinlock[%p].\n",
> handle));
> -
> -	kfree(handle);
> -
> -	return;
> -}
> -
>  acpi_status
>  acpi_os_create_semaphore(u32 max_units, u32 initial_units,
acpi_handle *
> handle)
>  {
> diff -puN drivers/acpi/utilities/utmutex.c~remove-acpi_os_create_lock-
> acpi_os_delete_lock drivers/acpi/utilities/utmutex.c
> --- devel/drivers/acpi/utilities/utmutex.c~remove-acpi_os_create_lock-
> acpi_os_delete_lock	2006-06-01 20:17:08.000000000 -0700
> +++ devel-akpm/drivers/acpi/utilities/utmutex.c	2006-06-01
> 20:17:08.000000000 -0700
> @@ -51,6 +51,8 @@ static acpi_status acpi_ut_create_mutex(
> 
>  static acpi_status acpi_ut_delete_mutex(acpi_mutex_handle mutex_id);
> 
> +static spinlock_t __acpi_gbl_gpe_lock;
> +
> 
>
/***********************************************************************
**
> ******
>   *
>   * FUNCTION:    acpi_ut_mutex_initialize
> @@ -80,7 +82,8 @@ acpi_status acpi_ut_mutex_initialize(voi
>  		}
>  	}
> 
> -	status = acpi_os_create_lock(&acpi_gbl_gpe_lock);
> +	spin_lock_init(&__acpi_gbl_gpe_lock);
> +	acpi_gbl_gpe_lock = &__acpi_gbl_gpe_lock;
>  	return_ACPI_STATUS(status);
>  }
> 
> @@ -109,7 +112,6 @@ void acpi_ut_mutex_terminate(void)
>  		(void)acpi_ut_delete_mutex(i);
>  	}
> 
> -	acpi_os_delete_lock(acpi_gbl_gpe_lock);
>  	return_VOID;
>  }
> 
> diff -puN include/acpi/acpiosxf.h~remove-acpi_os_create_lock-
> acpi_os_delete_lock include/acpi/acpiosxf.h
> --- devel/include/acpi/acpiosxf.h~remove-acpi_os_create_lock-
> acpi_os_delete_lock	2006-06-01 20:17:08.000000000 -0700
> +++ devel-akpm/include/acpi/acpiosxf.h	2006-06-01
20:17:08.000000000 -
> 0700
> @@ -108,10 +108,6 @@ acpi_status acpi_os_wait_semaphore(acpi_
> 
>  acpi_status acpi_os_signal_semaphore(acpi_handle handle, u32 units);
> 
> -acpi_status acpi_os_create_lock(acpi_handle * out_handle);
> -
> -void acpi_os_delete_lock(acpi_handle handle);
> -
>  acpi_cpu_flags acpi_os_acquire_lock(acpi_handle handle);
> 
>  void acpi_os_release_lock(acpi_handle handle, acpi_cpu_flags flags);
> _
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi"
in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux