Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ESC meeting minutes: 2020-03-05

[Rene Engelhard <rene@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 09:22:51AM +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 01:50:06AM +0800, Markus Mohrhard <markus.mohrhard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Is there still a reason to have independent unitcheck and slowcheck
> > targets? They are historically different because a default module level
> > make would only execute the unitcheck and not the slowcheck target but if a
> > module level make is not executing a unitcheck anymore, slowcheck can just
> > be merged into unitcheck.
> 
> I think you're right, that could be simplified once the above change
> goes in.

And i think https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/88833 should then be
done, too, as it makes it more clear (what is a "subsequentcheck"?) and
would be a good rationale to rename
https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libreoffice-subsequentcheckbase
to something sane (that one is used for in the autopkgtests which run
the junit tests against a installed (in /usr/lib/libreoffice) LO)

Regards,

Rene
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice