Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ESC meeting minutes: 2020-03-05

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/03/2020 16:31, Rene Engelhard wrote:
And i think https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/88833 should then be
done, too, as it makes it more clear (what is a "subsequentcheck"?) and
would be a good rationale to rename
https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libreoffice-subsequentcheckbase
to something sane (that one is used for in the autopkgtests which run
the junit tests against a installed (in /usr/lib/libreoffice) LO)

I'm not sure I understand you. subsequentcheck is orthongonal to JUnitTest. There are JUnitTests that are not in subsequentcheck, and there are tests other than JUnitTests that are in subsequentcheck.

(For mostly historical reasons, the difference between unitcheck and subsequentcheck is that the latter depends on a fully populated instdir before running its tests. After the transition from the two-stage dmake-based build system to gbuild was completed, this could have been cleaned up, moving the relevant dependencies into the individual tests. But then again, the distinction between unitcheck and subsequentcheck continued to look somewhat useful, to have a default make target that runs some but not all of the tests. Now that that odd default make target is going away, it should indeed become possible to drop the distinction between unitcheck and subsequentcheck.)

_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice



[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

  Powered by Linux