Re: Java min version for master sources?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 21.05.19 11:48, Samuel Mehrbrodt wrote:
Why not have a separate minumum java version for development?

We could require Java 8 for the dev/build machines, but produce java 6 bytecode.

So for end users nothing changes (Java 6 still supported), but developers can make use of new java features.

you could make use of new Java language features, but not new JDK library features, which was the problem in this case.
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice




[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

  Powered by Linux