Am 12. April 2019 09:43:01 MESZ schrieb Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@xxxxxxxxxx>: >On 11/04/2019 10:35, Stephan Bergmann wrote: >> On 11/04/2019 09:30, Thorsten Behrens wrote: >>> I'd prefer a backport to both maintained branches - at the current >>> speed of new binary Java distros springing up (and the overall >>> trajectory of that ecosystem there), I'd expect more of those issues >>> down the road. >> >> Fair enough. Gerrit changes up for review at >> <https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/70587/> for libreoffice-6-1 and >at >> <https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/70586/> for libreoffice-6-2. > >(BTW, I only tested my fix against stock OpenJDK reporting the Oracle >vendor string, by manually removing that vendor information from my >local LO sources temporarily. It would be great if somebody could >actually test it against one of those problematic OpenJDK variants that > >are unknown in the LO sources.) >_______________________________________________ >LibreOffice mailing list >LibreOffice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice Hi, Did that last night with the libreoffice-6-1 branch including the backport. Seems to work. At least no test failure :) Regards, Rene -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Gerät mit K-9 Mail gesendet. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice