Re: On backporting fix for tdf#124503 "LibreOffice doesn't detect JVM because of unexpected java.vendor property value"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/04/2019 10:35, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 11/04/2019 09:30, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
I'd prefer a backport to both maintained branches - at the current
speed of new binary Java distros springing up (and the overall
trajectory of that ecosystem there), I'd expect more of those issues
down the road.

Fair enough.  Gerrit changes up for review at <https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/70587/> for libreoffice-6-1 and at <https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/70586/> for libreoffice-6-2.

(BTW, I only tested my fix against stock OpenJDK reporting the Oracle vendor string, by manually removing that vendor information from my local LO sources temporarily. It would be great if somebody could actually test it against one of those problematic OpenJDK variants that are unknown in the LO sources.)
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice




[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

  Powered by Linux