Hi Stephan, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > If not, the question is whether to backport the above fix to > libreoffice-6-1 (towards LO 6.1.6), libreoffice-6-2 (towards LO > 6.2.4), and maybe even libreoffice-6-2-3. The fix isn't exactly > small, so I would prefer to not backport it aggressively. But I > don't know how severely users would be affected by this issue. > I'd prefer a backport to both maintained branches - at the current speed of new binary Java distros springing up (and the overall trajectory of that ecosystem there), I'd expect more of those issues down the road. Cheers, -- Thorsten
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
