The overarching point, from my perspective, is that this list is not a "project" at all, but a clearinghouse for configuration of routing & traffic control on the platform. As such, sunsetting it would be counterproductive. Anyway, that's the view from this tiny (and very quiet) corner, rudely top-posted (sorry about that). Cheers, all. On October 31, 2023 4:53:38 PM EDT, Rich Brown <richb.hanover@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >I don't have a clear sense of the lartc.org project status, but I wanted to comment on a possible update to its website. > >A while back, I ported the website to use Bootstrap3 to give a modern look while retaining virtually all the text on the site. It is now posted at: lartc.richb-hanover.com > >The github repo for the updated site is at: https://github.com/richb-hanover/lartc-redesign > >The project is free to use this repo or not. > >Best regards, > >Rich Brown >richb.hanover@xxxxxxxxx > >> On Oct 31, 2023, at 12:57 PM, Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Hello, all: >> >> We're in the process of migrating vger lists to new infrastructure and, as >> such, we are reviewing all lists that appear inactive to gauge if we need to >> consider sunsetting them. >> >> The status of the LARTC project is not very clear to me, which is why I'm >> reaching out to list subscribers. From the outset, things aren't looking very >> alive: >> >> - the last update to lartc.org is from 2012 >> - the last update to lartc.git is also from 2012 >> >> However, there are still a few questions being asked on the list, which is now >> archived here: https://lore.kernel.org/lartc >> >> Does anyone have a good picture of the status of the project? Is it still >> relevant? >> >> -K > > -- Lewis
