Re: doubt about bridge qdisc

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:33:11 -0300
"Marco Aurelio" <marco.casaroli@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 9/16/07, Salatiel Filho <salatiel.filho@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi guys,  i have a little doubt ;
> > I have eth0 ethernet and eth1 wireless , and they are bridged in br0
> >
> > Is there any difference in the behavior between do
> >
> > tc qdisc add dev br0 root sfq
> >
> > OR
> >
> > tc qdisc add dev eth0 root sfq && tc qdisc add dev eth1 root sfq
> >
> >
> 
> Yes. Only local traffic is passed trough br0 and only all interface
> traffic is passed trough each interface.
> 

Also since bridge is a pseudo device it has no transmit queue so there
is no qdisc involved.


-- 
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux