On 9/2/07, Javier Ors <jaorani@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Hello again Javier > Mmmmmm, could you please post the output of this other command? > tc -s filter show dev eth0 parent ffff: Sure! root@fw:/root# tc -s filter show dev eth0 parent ffff: filter protocol ip pref 49 u32 filter protocol ip pref 49 u32 fh 800: ht divisor 1 filter protocol ip pref 49 u32 fh 800::800 order 2048 key ht 800 bkt 0 flowid :1 police 1d action drop rate 1420Kbit burst 10Kb mtu 2Kb match c0a80007/ffffffff at 16 Sent 0 bytes 0 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) filter protocol ip pref 50 u32 filter protocol ip pref 50 u32 fh 801: ht divisor 1 filter protocol ip pref 50 u32 fh 801::800 order 2048 key ht 801 bkt 0 flowid :1 police 1e action drop rate 2840Kbit burst 10Kb mtu 2Kb match 00000000/00000000 at 12 Sent 91611539 bytes 113192 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 24) > I've searched a little bit and I think that this solution is not going > to work, sorry, I would do the tests on my own machine but for the > moment this is not possible... That's ok, I appreciate all the trouble you're going to already! I couldn't possibly ask you more :-) > If it is what I'm afraid, you are going to have to use another scheme, > but don't worry, it's easy to find an alternative solution anyway. Ok. I've been doing some reading, and the little I could understand, I think the solution would be to mark all packets to/from that particular machine with iptables MARK or somesuch, and then have a class in tc set to whatever bandwidth I want to allocate, and some other tc command to bound those marked packets to that class. This is all theory, of couse, I haven't the slightest idea how to accomplish this, or even if this isn't complete hogwash :-) Regards, Aidan _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
