Re: Load Balance and SNAT problem.

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/26/2007 9:14 PM, Mohan Sundaram wrote:
I remember that route balancing has an option to perform per packet balancing and not per connection. If that were to work, then route cache would not be used IMHO. Per packet balancing is normally not done as it would break connections especially in NAT'ted scenario.

To quote the man page for ip, it looks like the balancing is not per packet as you indicate, but rather per-flow.

"""equalize - allow packet by packet randomization on multipath routes. Without this modifier, the route will be frozen to one selected nexthop, so that load splitting will only occur on per-flow base. equalize only works if the kernel is patched."""



Grant. . . .
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux