Christian Benvenuti wrote: > Do you mean to say that the handle of the root _qdisc_ is 11:0? > (I could not find that configuration command in your email) > > Is the traffic that should match the filter going through the qdisc at all? > (you can check the qdisc counters) > > If it is, then maybe there is another filter (with higher priority?) > that catches the packets earlier. Can it be the case? No, none of this was the cause. I think that was fw filter. I've changed to u32 and everything works fine: Before: #tc filter add dev eth1 parent 11:0 protocol ip handle 1 fw classid 11:2 After: #tc filter add dev eth1 parent 11:0 protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip dst 192.168.10.0/24 match mark 1 0xffff flowid 11:2 Cheers, -- Catalin Bucur mailto:cata@xxxxxxxxxxxx NOC @ Genius Network SRL - Galati - Romania _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
