ArcosCom Linux User wrote: > Then, the actual and updated and maintained substitute for ROUTE is using > CONNMARK and/or MARK and then add filters/rules to routes table with ip. > Am I in the truth? That has always been the better way. The route target is a hack, I'm don't know why it exists at all. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
