ArcosCom Linux User wrote: > Thanks for your response. > > I'm using multiple gateways for internet connection and having problems > with random disconection, and I not use ROUTE usually, but I was trying to > force only one gateway for one type of traffic (which the clients lost > conections and are having issues). > > I know I can use -j MARK or -j CONNMARK and this mark to filter, but I'm > using marks for another purposes and I can't use it for routing. Everything using marks supports bitmasks in 2.6.19. > The box is a dual xeon and the kernel has been compiled SMP enabled. > > I haven't tested ROUTE yet with this kernel (2.6.19), but with 2.6.18.x I > were having a problem with -j ROUTE in -t mangle and POSTROUTING chain. > > Perhaps ROUTE need a more in deepth revision? As I said, it needs to fill in the targetsize field and probably needs to adjust the target function signature. > Do I help more reporting the bug into netfilter-bugzilla? Its still down, but the ROUTE patch is unmaintained anyway. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
