Re: Re: For leaf classes is best PFIFO or SFQ?

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dnia piątek, 2 czerwca 2006 13:09, Stefano Mainardi napisał(a): 
> 2006/6/2, Jarek Poplawski <jarkap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > Stefano Mainardi wrote:
> > > Hi to all,
> > > i'm following this guide (http://www.opalsoft.net/qos/DS-28.htm), is
> > > very detailed, but i'm a bit confused about queuing disciplinse of
> > > leaf classes.
> > >
> > > In this guide the author uses PFIFO (see the scheme that i attached at
> > > message) in this way:
> > >
> > > # tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:21 handle 210: pfifo lmit 10
           ^^^^^
> >
> > rather that way:
> >
> > # tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:21 handle 210: pfifo limit 10
         ^^^^^
>
> therefore??? I do not understand ...

Well, pfifo is a discipline at the end of class, not the class.

I'm using sfq for every customer (the are limited to 256/384/512kbit), so they 
will be able to use the Internet even when using p2p programs.

-- 
| pozdrawiam / greetings | powered by Trustix, Gentoo and FreeBSD   |
|  Kajetan Staszkiewicz  | jabber,email,www: vegeta()tuxpowered net |
|        Vegeta          | IMQ devnames: http://www.tuxpowered.net  |
`------------------------^------------------------------------------'

Attachment: pgpFLRnXd3ccZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux