Re: SNAT on IPSEC tunnel with kernel 2.6/KAME tools?

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



	Could you (or someone else on the list) just tell me how this can be done 
with the netfilter? I could not find a way for it. I am with kernel 2.6.16-14 
now. The problem, again:

 >     Could not conceive an working set-up for an IPSEC VPN made with
 > racoon/setkey on which I have one address on my side acting as an SNAT
 > router for all traffic from my network to a network segment on the far
 > side.
 >
 > my network  --- my gateway  ---------------------- remote network
 > 10.0.0.0/24  - 10.0.0.1 (10.253.0.2)  -- tunnel - 192.168.0.0/22
 >
 >     The VPN starts on the gateway, simply all traffic destinate to
 > 192.168.0.0/22 should get an SNAT to 10.253.0.2 and go via the tunnel.
 > SNAT however is available only in POSTROUTING chain, and no outgoing
 > interface really exists with setkey.

 >     So, next rule should be implemented on the gateway: "Packets going to
 > 192.168.0.0/22 should be SNAT to 10.253.0.2 and go via the tunnel"

	George.

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux