SNAT on IPSEC tunnel with kernel 2.6/KAME tools?

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



	Hi,

	Could not conceive an working set-up for an IPSEC VPN made with racoon/setkey 
on which I have one address on my side acting as an SNAT router for all 
traffic from my network to a network segment on the far side. 

my network  --- my gateway  ---------------------- remote network
10.0.0.0/24  - 10.0.0.1 (10.253.0.2)  -- tunnel - 192.168.0.0/22

	All traffic starts on my side, so if I can SNAT/MASQUERADE packets to the 
tunnel address (10.253.0.2) it shall work. This would have been possible with 
FreeSwan, as it created network interfaces (ipsec0, ipsec1..), however with 
setkey there is no way of making it.
	
	The VPN starts on the gateway, simply all traffic destinate to 192.168.0.0/22 
should get an SNAT to 10.253.0.2 and go via the tunnel. SNAT however is 
available only in POSTROUTING chain, and no outgoing interface really exists 
with setkey.

	So, next rule should be implemented on the gateway: "Packets going to 
192.168.0.0/22 should be SNAT to 10.253.0.2 and go via the tunnel"

	Some ideas?

	Thanks, George.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux