Manish Kathuria
wrote:
> >>Sandeep Agarwal wrote:
>> >> >> I have gone through http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt AND further >> http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/ & got confused in choosing the right patch. >> Please suggest if I will choose Jumbo Patch patch-2.4.20-ja1.diff , is >> any other patches also required after this? If yes, is there >> any sequence in applying these patches? >> > >For your purpose, you need to choose one of the patches at >http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/#routes depending on your kernel. You dont need >the Jumbo patch for load balancing and failover. The "routes" patch >should suffice. > >-- >Manish Kathuria >http://www.tuxspace.com/ Thanks Manish.
I have download routes-2.4.20-9.diff as I have
RHEL3.0 (Kernel 2.4.21-9EL) & apply the same.
But the output as follows. Is this normal or any
problem?
# patch -p1 < routes-2.4.20-9.diff
patching file linux/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_nat.h patching file linux/include/linux/rtnetlink.h Hunk #1 succeeded at 231 (offset 3 lines). patching file linux/include/net/ip_fib.h Hunk #1 FAILED at 162. Hunk #2 succeeded at 180 with fuzz 1 (offset 5 lines). 1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file linux/include/net/ip_fib.h.rej patching file linux/include/net/route.h Hunk #1 FAILED at 49. Hunk #2 succeeded at 120 with fuzz 2 (offset -8 lines). Hunk #3 FAILED at 140. 2 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file linux/include/net/route.h.rej patching file linux/net/ipv4/arp.c patching file linux/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c Hunk #3 succeeded at 212 with fuzz 2. Hunk #4 FAILED at 222. Hunk #5 FAILED at 244. Hunk #6 succeeded at 583 (offset -7 lines). 2 out of 7 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file linux/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c.rej patching file linux/net/ipv4/fib_hash.c Hunk #2 FAILED at 313. Hunk #3 succeeded at 461 (offset 24 lines). Hunk #5 succeeded at 653 (offset 22 lines). 1 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file linux/net/ipv4/fib_hash.c.rej patching file linux/net/ipv4/fib_rules.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 307. Hunk #2 succeeded at 376 with fuzz 2. 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file linux/net/ipv4/fib_rules.c.rej patching file linux/net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c Hunk #4 succeeded at 365 (offset -1 lines). Hunk #5 FAILED at 383. Hunk #6 succeeded at 438 (offset 2 lines). Hunk #7 FAILED at 637. Hunk #8 succeeded at 905 (offset -1 lines). Hunk #9 succeeded at 954 (offset 2 lines). Hunk #10 succeeded at 1007 (offset -1 lines). Hunk #11 succeeded at 1025 with fuzz 1 (offset 2 lines). Hunk #12 succeeded at 1070 (offset -1 lines). 2 out of 12 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file linux/net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c.rej patching file linux/net/ipv4/ip_nat_dumb.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 124. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file linux/net/ipv4/ip_nat_dumb.c.rej patching file linux/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_fw_compat_masq.c Hunk #2 FAILED at 67. Hunk #3 succeeded at 104 (offset 1 line). 1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file linux/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_fw_compat_masq.c.rej patching file linux/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_nat_core.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 959 (offset 6 lines). patching file linux/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_nat_standalone.c patching file linux/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_MASQUERADE.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 88. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file linux/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_MASQUERADE.c.rej patching file linux/net/ipv4/route.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 928 (offset 78 lines). Hunk #2 FAILED at 1352. Hunk #3 FAILED at 1366. Hunk #4 succeeded at 1328 with fuzz 2. Hunk #5 FAILED at 1348. Hunk #6 succeeded at 1456 (offset 77 lines). Hunk #8 succeeded at 1485 (offset 77 lines). Hunk #9 FAILED at 1524. Hunk #11 succeeded at 1577 with fuzz 2 (offset 81 lines). Hunk #12 FAILED at 1590. Hunk #14 succeeded at 1625 (offset 81 lines). Hunk #15 succeeded at 1580 with fuzz 2 (offset 2 lines). Hunk #16 FAILED at 1593. Hunk #17 succeeded at 1737 (offset 80 lines). Hunk #18 FAILED at 1753. Hunk #19 succeeded at 1723 (offset 3 lines). Hunk #20 FAILED at 1760. Hunk #21 FAILED at 1850. Hunk #22 FAILED at 1858. Hunk #23 FAILED at 1901. Hunk #24 FAILED at 1909. Hunk #25 FAILED at 1972. Hunk #26 FAILED at 2053. 14 out of 26 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file linux/net/ipv4/route.c.rej patching file linux/net/netsyms.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 259 (offset 11 lines). # Thankyou,
Sandeep Agarwal
|
_______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc