Sandeep Agarwal wrote:
Manish Kathuria wrote:
>
>>Sandeep Agarwal wrote:
>>
>>
>> I have gone through http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt AND further
>> http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/ & got confused in choosing the right patch.
>> Please suggest if I will choose Jumbo Patch patch-2.4.20-ja1.diff , is
>> any other patches also required after this? If yes, is there
>> any sequence in applying these patches?
>>
>
>For your purpose, you need to choose one of the patches at
>http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/#routes depending on your kernel. You dont need
>the Jumbo patch for load balancing and failover. The "routes" patch
>should suffice.
>
>--
>Manish Kathuria
>http://www.tuxspace.com/
Thanks Manish.
I have download routes-2.4.20-9.diff as I have RHEL3.0 (Kernel
2.4.21-9EL) & apply the same.
But the output as follows. Is this normal or any problem?
# patch -p1 < routes-2.4.20-9.diff
Hunk #1 FAILED at 162.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 180 with fuzz 1 (offset 5 lines).
1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
linux/include/net/ip_fib.h.rej
patching file linux/include/net/route.h
Hunk #1 FAILED at 49.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 120 with fuzz 2 (offset -8 lines).
Hunk #3 FAILED at 140.
2 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
linux/include/net/route.h.rej
patching file linux/net/ipv4/arp.c
patching file linux/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
Hunk #3 succeeded at 212 with fuzz 2.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 222.
Hunk #5 FAILED at 244.
The Red Hat kernels are not just plain vanilla kernels. They already
have a number of patches applied by Red Hat and it is likely that the
patch being applied by you is conflicting by one of those. You can
either try some other kernel version or download a plain vanilla kernel
from http://www.kernel.org/ and apply the routes patch on it.
--
Manish
http://www.tuxspace.com/
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
