Re: Theory test

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kenneth Kalmer wrote:

Are we talking about ingress or egress?


Egress, all my ingress experiments worked 100% (mostly prioritization,
that's all)

That's handy I was expecting you to say ingress.

Outbound should be totally under your control.


How much bandwidth do you have (and how much are you sacrificing)?


Sadly, only 512kbits but upgrading to 1024kbits in Feb

You have 512kbit upstream - symmetrical dsl - what rate do you set htb?


What are the lengths of queues for each user?

Pardon me?

It's less relevant for egress - for ingress shaping the length of the queues if too long can mess things up, and unless you use esfq it would have been hard when shaping 200 users to reduce it/them.



What is the link DSL/other?


ADSL, African style...

Not sdsl then - is your egress 512?

Do you know what type of connection you have eg pppoa/e or bridged ip etc. I assume whatever it is ends up as atm cells?

Andy.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux