> This looks really neat! I considered building something similar in the > past but never got around to. Have you considered adding MRTG or > Cricket for graphing? Great suggestions. I definitely want to include monitoring tools. I have used ntop before, but ran into performance issues even on a T-1 link (Pentium Pro proc) -- but come to think of it I was also doing some heavy monitoring of the queues. MRTG and Cricket look to be much lighter weight. Do you have experience with which one would require less CPU? Thanks, -Ron _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
