Geri Fehringer wrote:
Hi fellows, i'm just a newbie to use the cool tc and played around the last 2 weeks. I'm quite confident - in theory - what's possible and the basic difference between the queuing disciplines. We're using a Fedora Core 3 box as Gateway (iptables,tc,iproute2 with NAT). Clients are coming in via eth1 and outgouing traffic (2Mbit/s SDSL) through eth0. So we would like to enable bandwidth limitation per-user, so i just used several scripts (htp from sourceforge,cbq.init ,wondershaper etc). (Each client: Downstream max 128kbit/s, Upstream max 90kbit/s) Shaping is working fine if i mark this specific source with a iptables rule, but as soon i apply multiple different source ip's to mark it within the same queue, all are sharing my limitation and i thought each of them will get the rate-limiting.
You need to have a seperate class and mark for each user
I also tried the u23 matching within tc, but same effect,
When doing NAT u32 will work for downloads shaped on the lan facing interface but not for uploads on the wan interface you need to mark/classify.
qdisc cbq 1: rate 2Mbit (bounded,isolated) prio no-transmit
I would use htb with a class for each user - It would probably be nicer to seperate interactive traffic out from bulk aswell - depends on how many users share the bandwidth really.
Andy. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
