Re: Re: Confuse, putting packets in wrong mangle table.

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Saturday 29 January 2005 00:55, Andy Furniss wrote:
> > I ve tried this before, but never succeed. I didnt know where should i
> > attach the 10:100 class. In the document, just told to add this class in
> > tc, without giving some information which interface should i attach this
> > class.
> I've not used squid, but think the idea is to shape on eth0 traffic from
> inet to lan and miss traffic from squid to lan. The patch lets you
> classify miss traffic from squid which you make an htb class for and you
> can then involve it in sharing/priorotising etc with other inet to lan
> traffic.
> Andy.


Thanks Andy for the info u gave,
But the patch is totally missed with Squid-2.5.STABLE7, so i have to do it 
manually.

I tried to placed this 10:100 class into eth0 (inet interface) and 
successfully do some shaping on outgoing request from squid to origin server 
where client request.
It wont shape the incoming from origin server to squid.
As u see, this is tcp_outgoing_priority, not tcp_incoming_priority.. :))

so i still have to figure out more how to shape incoming packets to this squid 
proxy.

- Rio.Martin -
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux