* Andy Furniss <41DC06D8.70301@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-01-05 15:25
Thomas Graf wrote:
That looks handy :-) Do you know why fw mark doesn't work with policers in 2.6 (assuming it's not just me)
Be prepared to see it removed again in favour of the meta extended match. Don't rely too much on it.
I searched a bit around meta data recently but couldn't find much - do you have any links?
http://oss.sgi.com/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00767.html http://oss.sgi.com/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00028.html
Thanks.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=lartc&m=110122532022827&w=2
Do you see the police/action stats being updated? i.e. does the matching itself work?
From memory yes - counters showed OK on iptables and tc -s qdisc ls dev eth0 just no drops
I'll repeat tonight to be sure.
Andy.
Ingress qdisc reads from prerouting hook as well, might be a priority issue. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
_______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
