That looks handy :-) Do you know why fw mark doesn't work with policers in 2.6 (assuming it's not just me)
Be prepared to see it removed again in favour of the meta extended match. Don't rely too much on it.
I searched a bit around meta data recently but couldn't find much - do you have any links?
Regarding fw, what exactly is not working? fw doesn't handle police results properly, the patchset at http://people.suug.ch/~tgr/patches/pending/ fixes this. Given its another issue, I would be curious to know what exactly is not working.
It was for a test I did, though I notice some of the diffserv examples use it aswell (albeit with ipchains).
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=lartc&m=110122532022827&w=2
ISTR having to mess about a bit last time when applying esfq patch to get it to work.
Would you guys like to see esfq included in mainline?
Yea - that would be great :-)
Andy.
_______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
