My intension is of course to match p2p first, then others. I realised i must be more carefully with marks, since it does not get marked from first packets. I belive some sort of masks applyed to marks are necesary, the p2p should begin all with, let's say 0x2 then 3 hex "digits" so i can distinguish non p2p for other purpose later. Is it possible better ? (i bet it does). On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:00:39 +0200, Andreas Klauer <andreas.klauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Am Thursday 30 September 2004 14:42 schrieb George Alexandru Dragoi: > > Such traffic will be matched agains src ip or dest ip, or port number > > If you can use these kinds of optimizations, then that's fine. > In my case, P2P applications can run on any port and any IP, > so it's not possible for me. If I added a filter rule like that, > chances are good that clients would find out and use these ports > for their P2P applications. > > Andreas > _______________________________________________ > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ > -- Bla bla _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
