RE: should I shape tun[N] or eth0 ?

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



AFAIK, tc will work on real and not virtual interfaces.

Warm regards
Mohan  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: lartc-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:lartc-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Etienne Ledoux
> Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 9:05 PM
> To: lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject:  should I shape tun[N] or eth0 ?
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> me again. I'm starting to feel miff now.
> 
> If I have a few vpn tunnels with different tun interfaces. 
> And all this tunnel traffic is coming in on my eth0 
> interface, it also leave via eth0 again. I would like to 
> share the available bandwidth evenly with tunnel clients. 
> Would applying the bandwidth rule on eth0 with htb & sfq work 
> for sharing the bandwidth or will bandwidth rules only affect 
> tunnel traffic if I apply it to the actual tun[n] intefaces ?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
> 

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux